> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.rentfax.io/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Understanding the RentFAX risk score

> The RentFAX composite score runs from 100 to 1000 and combines payment history, asset condition, identity verification, and network standing.

The RentFAX risk score is a single number — between 100 and 1000 — that summarizes a renter's history across the entire RentFAX network. Rather than relying on a single data point like a credit score, it combines four weighted components that reflect real rental behavior: how reliably a renter pays, how they treat rental assets, whether their identity is verified, and how they stand across all operators who've worked with them. A higher score means lower risk.

## Score tiers

Every renter's composite score maps to a risk tier that drives the rental recommendation you see in the dashboard.

| Score range | Risk tier | Recommendation   | What it means                                                |
| ----------- | --------- | ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ |
| ≥ 800       | LOW       | APPROVED         | Clean record. Proceed with confidence.                       |
| ≥ 600       | MODERATE  | CONDITIONAL      | Minor history present. Review the summary before proceeding. |
| ≥ 400       | HIGH      | REVIEW\_REQUIRED | Significant incidents. Manual review strongly recommended.   |
| \< 400      | CRITICAL  | DENIED           | Serious or repeated history. Decline or escalate.            |

<Info>
  The risk tier and recommendation are separate from the eligibility label shown during a renter search. Eligibility uses different thresholds (≥ 750 / ≥ 500 / ≥ 250 / \< 250). Both are displayed on the renter profile — use them together when making a decision.
</Info>

## Score components

The composite score is calculated from four components. Each component is scored on a 0–1000 scale and then weighted to produce the final number.

```
Composite = (payment_history × 0.40) + (asset_condition × 0.30) + (identity_verified × 0.20) + (network_standing × 0.10)
```

<AccordionGroup>
  <Accordion title="Payment history — 40% weight">
    **What it measures:** Whether the renter has paid in full across their rental history.

    The score is calculated as the ratio of fully paid rentals to total rentals, scaled to 1000. A renter who has paid in full every time scores 1000. Outstanding balances pull the score down proportionally.

    | Label     | Score range |
    | --------- | ----------- |
    | Excellent | ≥ 800       |
    | Good      | ≥ 600       |
    | Poor      | \< 600      |

    Payment history carries the most weight because unpaid balances are the most direct indicator of financial risk to your business.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Asset condition — 30% weight">
    **What it measures:** How often the renter has returned rental assets with damage reported.

    The score is calculated as the ratio of undamaged returns to total rentals, scaled to 1000. A renter with zero damage reports scores 1000. Each damage incident reduces the score proportionally.

    | Label     | Score range |
    | --------- | ----------- |
    | Excellent | ≥ 800       |
    | Good      | ≥ 600       |
    | Poor      | \< 600      |

    This component directly reflects the physical risk of renting to this individual — relevant for vehicles, equipment, and residential properties alike.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Identity verified — 20% weight">
    **What it measures:** Whether the renter's identity has been verified through the RentFAX identity check.

    A verified renter scores **900**. An unverified renter scores **600**. There is no partial credit — the score depends entirely on verification status.

    | Label      | Score |
    | ---------- | ----- |
    | Verified   | 900   |
    | Unverified | 600   |

    Verification confirms that the person's submitted identity matches records on file. Unverified renters are not necessarily fraudulent, but the lower score reflects the additional uncertainty.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Network standing — 10% weight">
    **What it measures:** Outstanding unpaid balances across all operators in the RentFAX network.

    The score starts at 1000 and decreases by 150 for each unpaid rental. It floors at 0.

    ```
    network_standing = max(0, 1000 − (unpaid_rentals × 150))
    ```

    | Label                    | Score range |
    | ------------------------ | ----------- |
    | Good Standing            | ≥ 800       |
    | Has Outstanding Balances | \< 800      |

    Network standing provides a cross-operator signal. Even if a renter has a clean record with you, outstanding balances at other operators will lower this component.
  </Accordion>
</AccordionGroup>

## How the score is calculated

RentFAX calculates the score dynamically from the renter's incident and report history. The calculation runs every time you request a score via the dashboard or API, so you always see a current value.

If a renter has no history at all in the system, their score defaults to **850** — reflecting no negative signals rather than a strong positive record.

<Note>
  The score shown on the renter profile summary card is a cached value. The score breakdown view recalculates the composite live from the underlying reports. For the most accurate reading, use the score breakdown view rather than the summary card.
</Note>

## AI risk explanations

Each score comes with an AI-generated summary that explains the key drivers in plain language. You can find this under **Risk Explanation** on the renter's profile. The explanation highlights which components are pulling the score down and why, so you can make a well-informed decision without interpreting raw numbers yourself.

## Related pages

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Renter screening" icon="user-search" href="/features/renter-screening">
    How to search for a renter and read their full profile
  </Card>

  <Card title="Fraud detection" icon="alert-triangle" href="/features/fraud-detection">
    AI signals that run alongside the risk score
  </Card>

  <Card title="Incidents" icon="clipboard-list" href="/features/incidents">
    How logged incidents feed into the score components
  </Card>

  <Card title="Disputes" icon="scale" href="/features/disputes">
    How renters can challenge records that affect their score
  </Card>
</CardGroup>
